3 ms·
wayland annoys the toxic people, because it is currently favoring easy alternative implementations. It won't last, probably. Those toxic people usually always
by sylware 2y ago
wayland annoys the toxic people, because it is currently favoring easy alternative implementations.
It won't last, probably.
Those toxic people usually always get their way into "core", pouring tons and tons of interfaces and dirty everything, viciously adding "features" to provoke some level of planned obsolescences over some few years cycles.
Pure evil.
- ahartmetz 2y agoI'm not sure who you are being sarcastic about in the end, but yes, Wayland is indeed clean and simple enough to not particularly discourage alternative implementations.
- sylware 2y agoHuh. Indeed, we agree. We just need to do the hardest part: keep it clean and simple to not particularly discourage alternative implementations... on the long run.
- ahartmetz 2y ago...while also doing what users want and expect.
- sylware 2y ago... while avoiding their tantrums which will most likely destroy that "clean and simple".
- immibis 2y agoFor example, it's vitally important that wayland resists adding features like title bars, window icons, resize handles, desktop icons, or mouse cursors. These frivolous features have no place in a serious desktop environment! They are only bloat!