2 ms·
Probably should have the date of (2001) on it.
by zitterbewegung 2y ago
Probably should have the date of (2001) on it.
- prerok 2y agoDid you mean 2021?
- krisoft 2y ago> Probably should have the date of (2001) on it. I assume that is a typo. The paper and the article are both from 2021. But also, did the planets stop orbiting since? Did someone turn of gravity? What changed since then which makes the date of it so important?