3 ms·

Reportedly, the original Android was more of a Blackberry ripoff, with a keyboard and directional keys instead of a touchscreen. Once they saw what the iPhone w

Reportedly, the original Android was more of a Blackberry ripoff, with a keyboard and directional keys instead of a touchscreen. Once they saw what the iPhone was doing, they quickly pivoted and changed the whole product, so the Android we see today has nothing to do with the Android of 2004. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/10/building-android-a-40000-word-history-of-googles-mobile-os/#milestone3 https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/10/building-android-a-4...

deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
efaref 2y ago
I think this was just more of a function of technology. Good quality capacitive touchscreens only really started to become available in the mid 2000s, and even the early ones weren't that great (e.g. no multi-touch). Without this you're forced into using keyboards if you want to have any kind of usable interface for typing, or you do something like the graffiti writing system that psion PDAs had in the 90s.
- freitzkriesler2 2y ago
  No they were just pressure sensitive screens. You could use a finger to navigate but again not as accurate. The solution instead was to perfect one handed navigation which was what palm os 5 did and input writing with either a keyboard (handheld/onscreen) or graffiti like you said.
- orev 2y ago
  The CoRecursive podcast has an episode with Chet Haase where he specifically outlines how they were cloning BlackBerry and then had to drop everything and rebuild when they heard about the iPhone OS. He directly states that Android wouldn’t have had a touch interface if the iPhone didn’t exist. GUI interfaces using a capacitive touch screen became good because of iPhone, not as part of a natural progression of technology.
Brian_K_White 2y ago
But I had a Samsung PalmOS phone with no keyboard or numpad or dpad, and a full color touch home screen grid of 3rd party app icons, in full final production in the hands of users like me, in 2000 or 2001. Samsung SPH-i300

deleted 2y ago

[deleted]

efaref 2y ago

I think this was just more of a function of technology. Good quality capacitive touchscreens only really started to become available in the mid 2000s, and even the early ones weren't that great (e.g. no multi-touch). Without this you're forced into using keyboards if you want to have any kind of usable interface for typing, or you do something like the graffiti writing system that psion PDAs had in the 90s.

freitzkriesler2 2y ago
No they were just pressure sensitive screens. You could use a finger to navigate but again not as accurate. The solution instead was to perfect one handed navigation which was what palm os 5 did and input writing with either a keyboard (handheld/onscreen) or graffiti like you said.
orev 2y ago
The CoRecursive podcast has an episode with Chet Haase where he specifically outlines how they were cloning BlackBerry and then had to drop everything and rebuild when they heard about the iPhone OS. He directly states that Android wouldn’t have had a touch interface if the iPhone didn’t exist. GUI interfaces using a capacitive touch screen became good because of iPhone, not as part of a natural progression of technology.

Brian_K_White 2y ago

But I had a Samsung PalmOS phone with no keyboard or numpad or dpad, and a full color touch home screen grid of 3rd party app icons, in full final production in the hands of users like me, in 2000 or 2001. Samsung SPH-i300