4 ms·
Its one optional line in a header that you don't even need to use if you don't want to. But sure, lets throw out the baby with the bathwater. The fact that JSON
by lenkite 2y ago
Its one optional line in a header that you don't even need to use if you don't want to. But sure, lets throw out the baby with the bathwater. The fact that JSON cannot have comments is a far more serious drawback than a single line at the top of the document.
- mort96 2y agoI like formats which are XML except without the <?xml?> and xmlns stuff. However, most XML I encounter does have that stuff, so it's a reason why I usually hate dealing with XML. This shouldn't be difficult to comprehend. You don't have to run defence for a file format like this.
- hju22_-3 2y agoThis reads more like a case of you having left ambiguity in what exactly you disliked. And rather than defending the position, I found the reply fitting towards what it seemed like you disliked: the need for rather specific header tags. Now you've clarified it further, and it's clearer that it's not the need for header tags specifically that is the problem. For what it's worth, I do agree that the syntax may be a tad strange. But I feel that, as with many of these issues, this is a tooling issue. Now, whether or not tooling will be made or not, for these kinds of problems, is unrelated. As an aside, I rarely remember the HTML header tag; but that's fine, I have tooling that does it for me.