Their documentation says "passes almost all tests": https://rustdoc.swc.rs/swc_ecma_parser/ https://rustdoc.swc.rs/swc_ecma_parser/ Which could be outdated as

Their documentation says "passes almost all tests": https://rustdoc.swc.rs/swc_ecma_parser/ https://rustdoc.swc.rs/swc_ecma_parser/ Which could be outdated as well. But if that's true, it's the problem isn't it? If some of the most important information about a critical part of the toolchain isn't up-to-date, how can I have confidence in this? (Also for my specific use case, I need to set an ecmascript version, something that is common in JS based parsers, but it's not available in swc ecma parser. At least I didn't find it.) For context, I contributed to acorn to fix an issue I found while using it in one of my projects. But that happened because I extensively used acorn in the first place. I don't quite have the confidence to adopt these Rust based tools yet.