4 ms·
NoSQL: If Only It Were That Easy
- slurgfest 14y agoI think it must be noted that this is very old - apparently written in 2009 - and while it may have been good at the time, it does not reflect the current state of affairs.
- fennecfoxen 14y agoYeah, for example: Cassandra's pretty happy with a node going down these days and has matured reasonably well. My company is using it for their production systems, and the only problems we've seen were either us doing something wrong, or client-library quirks for certain languages (they favor Java/Python in those parts).
- seanp2k2 14y ago/pretty happy/ is a long way away from /ACID/ NoSQL has a place, but IMO that place is not primary data storage (in most cases.) I asked one large, household-name IT company on a recent interview what they'd do if their DC containing all of their Cassandra nodes went down. Their response was "it doesn't go down" (and if it did, they'd lose data)... ... ... amateurs.
- jzoidberg 14y agoCassandra stretches across multiple DC's nicely by design.
- nicolasd 14y agoyes I know that this is an old article but I like the conclusion: "The real thing to point out is that if you are being held back from making something super awesome because you can’t choose a database, you are doing it wrong." Is there any good article about all advantages of nosql and rdbms? Because I think this decision is very hard to make if you have no experience with much data and handling
- smarx 14y agoThe subjunctive mood: if only it were that easy. :-)
- amirmansour 14y agoCan someone with production level Redis experience explain why Redis doesn't scale, while taking into account what this article stated?