3 ms·
except it is. try to upload to YouTube your birthday party with a barely audible pop music playing in the background. now which argument can't be taken seriou
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
except it is.
try to upload to YouTube your birthday party with a barely audible pop music playing in the background.
now which argument can't be taken seriously?
granted, it's not jail. but being removed from the monopoly forum for internet videos could be worse than jail if you're business depends on that.
- johnnyanmac 2y ago>granted, it's not jail. That's a pretty important distinction. >being removed from the monopoly forum for internet videos could be worse than jail if you're business depends on that. If your business relies on thst then strike up a deal. That's what copyright should be doing. The situation is still stupid, yes. But the core issue of people profiting off of material they dont own is still something we want to protect against.
- 1oooqooq 2y agostrike a deal with publisher for every incidental background music barely noticeable one your videos?
- johnnyanmac 2y agoIdeally, make your own music. Or use people's music who wants to share, they get popular and rise as a competitor and it shows that maybe going after minor background noise wasn't such a good idea. But back in reality, you just don't monetize the content. Publishers don't really care about some unlisted kid's party with 50 views and monetization off. The YouTube stuff is draconian but not that asinine.