3 ms·

You're not paying for access though. You're paying for curation. Access to any given site is free (ignoring the cost of internet access itself) assuming you kno

by iteria 2y ago

You're not paying for access though. You're paying for curation. Access to any given site is free (ignoring the cost of internet access itself) assuming you know the URL. What is not free is someone taking your query and finding sites that might be what you want. You pay in currency or attention. Take your pick. We all need to think about paying for the internet because literally none of it is free. Not even the hobby blog on a random desktop in someone's basement. It still costs them that bit more in electricity. If no one will pay then we all deserve to drown in ads because that's what we say we wanted with our non-dollars.

eth0up 2y ago
I do not deny that there's validity to your points. For me, it's the wrong interpretation. Again, I understand the points, but the way I gaze into the future reflects an ugly picture if we allow ourselves to go this direction. We're immersing ourselves in a service (no production) economy which could easily result in a nightmare situation where too many people are trying to survive by creating problems to solve and every individual's primary existential purpose is to be economically, perpetually gnawed at by fellow parasites. The entire concept of currency is problematic and I foresee such things severely exacerbating it. I won't hold you back, but I will myself. And don't perceive my words as a challenge, insult or anything negative - it's just something that makes, perhaps, too much sense to me.
- palata 2y ago
  Are you saying that "the entire concept of currency is problematic", and therefore you want to get stuff for free, even though you know that those who provide this stuff do it in exchange of money? Sounds like saying that in order to solve poverty, you steal everything... your reasoning makes absolutely no sense to me.

3 ms·

You're not paying for access though. You're paying for curation. Access to any given site is free (ignoring the cost of internet access itself) assuming you kno

by iteria 2y ago

eth0up 2y ago
I do not deny that there's validity to your points. For me, it's the wrong interpretation. Again, I understand the points, but the way I gaze into the future reflects an ugly picture if we allow ourselves to go this direction. We're immersing ourselves in a service (no production) economy which could easily result in a nightmare situation where too many people are trying to survive by creating problems to solve and every individual's primary existential purpose is to be economically, perpetually gnawed at by fellow parasites. The entire concept of currency is problematic and I foresee such things severely exacerbating it. I won't hold you back, but I will myself. And don't perceive my words as a challenge, insult or anything negative - it's just something that makes, perhaps, too much sense to me.
- palata 2y ago
  Are you saying that "the entire concept of currency is problematic", and therefore you want to get stuff for free, even though you know that those who provide this stuff do it in exchange of money? Sounds like saying that in order to solve poverty, you steal everything... your reasoning makes absolutely no sense to me.