This depends on the assumption that going to the trouble of making a carefully curated commit history well documented is even worth the trouble. Sometimes it m

This depends on the assumption that going to the trouble of making a carefully curated commit history well documented is even worth the trouble. Sometimes it might be, but I don't think it's a given. > The squash branch on merge strategy is just lazy "Lazy" is the negative way of saying "easy" or even "more efficient". "Lazy" implies that the other way is better. Is it? Maybe sometimes. Am I "lazy" if I walk on my feet instead of my hands? It really is a lot easier.