3 ms·
Being brief is ok. But if you're allowing for a broader interpretation of "being in business", then that's so broad that it's meaningless. me "what's your crit
by lkdfjlkdfjlg 2y ago
Being brief is ok. But if you're allowing for a broader interpretation of "being in business", then that's so broad that it's meaningless.
me "what's your criterion for being good at investing?"
you "you're good when you do well"
If you're so brief that you end up saying nothing at all, just skip the typing instead.
- josephg 2y ago> Being brief is ok. But if you're allowing for a broader interpretation of "being in business", then that's so broad that it's meaningless. On reflection, the long version of my comment is something like this: “The market is the best judge of VC funds. Good choices mean good returns. Bad choices mean VC funds go out of business. And BMF had been profitable for 113 years. Make of that what you will.” In retrospect, perhaps I could have said that. > …, just skip the typing instead. Similarly, lay off on policing my words so heavily. It’s rude. You are a single voice, and while your opinion is interesting, how I phrase things simply isn’t up to you. Especially when you do so from an anonymous burner account, “lkdfjlkdfjlg”. If you don’t like my tone, perhaps consider following your own advice. Skip all the typing and just downvote my comments.