3 ms·
It's pretty easy to see where they're coming from. Apple's approach to AI integration draws a pretty clear line between the part that Apple controls and takes
by dialup_sounds 2y ago
It's pretty easy to see where they're coming from.
Apple's approach to AI integration draws a pretty clear line between the part that Apple controls and takes credit/blame for privacy of (i.e. on-device models and their private cloud system) and third-parties that require specific consent to send data to (ChatGPT).
If the EU decided that Apple has to allow their whole on-device and private cloud stack to be warning-less-ly swapped out for PII_GrabberGPT, NüdLeaker Pro, or ScamBot9000 if the user chooses it from a legally required randomized menu, then I can see why they would have rational concerns about user privacy.
- ankit219 2y agoThe problem is not just about interoperability. According to DSA, given Apple is one of the designated companies, they are responsible for security and privacy while DMA mandates that they allow for interoperability when they add functionalities. It's a fundamental conflict and requires trade off. Apple is likely waiting for the current term to be over in november and then deal with the new regime. Vestager is called a waning star, and she has been most vocal about it in recent times.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> Apple is likely waiting for the current term to be over I imagine they need the likes of Mistral to lobby for them. Being locked out of the richest billion people in the world’s phones structurally disadvantages the European AI sector.