4 ms·
Thanks, that was extremely helpful. I don't think I understand your point in (1) that it's less of an issue because development is moving to the LLM. I can inf
by ants_everywhere 2y ago
Thanks, that was extremely helpful.
I don't think I understand your point in (1) that it's less of an issue because development is moving to the LLM. I can infer that maybe CUDA isn't a big part of the moat given your other points that the hard part is making cutting edge chips.
- gmays 2y agoIt's just the natural evolution of tech towards higher levels of abstraction. In the beginning most dev was on CUDA because the models had to be built and trained. But since there are plenty of more advanced models now, the next level is getting built out as more developers start building applications that use the models (e.g. apps using GPT's API). So where 5 years ago most AI dev was on CUDA, now most is on the LLMs that were built with CUDA to build applications.