2 ms·

> But the browser space, Ladybird is viable as a daily driver for people. From the LWM article: > Users will need GCC 13+ or Clang 17, and Qt6 development pac

by diggan 2y ago

> But the browser space, Ladybird is viable as a daily driver for people. From the LWM article: > Users will need GCC 13+ or Clang 17, and Qt6 development packages to play along at home. Ladybird compiles and runs on, for example, Fedora 40 without a problem, *but it is a long way from being suitable for regular use.* Seems distributed binaries are missing, but that's easy to "fix"/"workaround". Is there something else that makes you say it is suitable as a daily driver while LWM author does not?

ranger_danger 2y ago
> Seems distributed binaries are missing, Even with SerenityOS they long were of the mindset that binaries/ISO/etc. should not be produced and distributed by them apparently.