3 ms·
> You want to support YouTube, don't you? Of course no. You can use a bloated browser for that.
by starbugs 2y ago
> You want to support YouTube, don't you?
Of course no. You can use a bloated browser for that.
- immibis 2y agoThen nobody will ever use your browser. Simple as that.
- 8organicbits 2y agoI think people forget the early 2000s. Many sites only worked on IE but Firefox was the better browser. Firefox users had an extension that would open certain links in IE or open the current page in IE via the context menu. If a lightweight browser could be significantly faster and more secure, people would tolerate using two browsers again. Although Ladybird hasn't reached that bar. YouTube certainly could use a small set of web standards, although YT regularly breaks on Firefox. It's a video player with links and forms.
- ranger_danger 2y ago> YT regularly breaks on Firefox Source? I've never had a single problem ever, and I don't know anyone else that has either.
- 8organicbits 2y agoSure, here's a couple mentions from just the last ten days. Loads more if you search around. https://mapstodon.space/@hareldan/112619447620823614 https://mapstodon.space/@hareldan/112619447620823614 https://techhub.social/@weston/112607264644039009 https://techhub.social/@weston/112607264644039009 https://pdx.social/@crowdotblack/112604055589800602 https://pdx.social/@crowdotblack/112604055589800602 https://social.bitwig.community/@gerotakke/112631068990105521 https://social.bitwig.community/@gerotakke/11263106899010552...
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- immibis 2y agoYouTube has a vested interest to work best on Chrome.
- ranger_danger 2y agoIt doesn't need to be mainstream, that will probably ruin it anyways.