3 ms·

Those who are not poor are usually better at legal* loopholes. Having watched No Country for Old Men (in which a bunch of characters are perfectly horrid to eac

Those who are not poor are usually better at legal* loopholes. Having watched No Country for Old Men (in which a bunch of characters are perfectly horrid to each other for amazingly small amounts of money), I'd suspect dropping 14k somewhere like Henley&Partners might offer better options than the reported 70k for one of these packages? * are they discovered or are they invented? this is a question of philosophy among the community serving (U)HNWIs. EDIT: on the other hand, if the objective were avoiding even a hint of KYC (as in 935 Pennsylvania's NOC theory of "illegals"), maybe these pathways would make sense?

alephnerd 2y ago
> Those who are not poor are usually better at legal* loopholes > I'd suspect dropping 14k somewhere like Henley&Partners might offer better options than the reported 70k for one of these packages My Tau's land in the old country is now valued at $100-150k thanks to a highway expansion tender and can generate $15k a year being rented out to Reliance Jio as a gas pump, and the remaining land is still tilled and gets MSP benefits of $5k. That's a passive income if $20k/yr in a small Himalayan village. My Tau has a high school education and has never heard of the American legal system or investors visas. This is a common story with the rural middle and upper class. With that level of money, it's very easy to make a successful business in India, China, or Vietnam, but a mix of ignorance and Social Media convinces gullible people that this is the only way.