3 ms·
> The subtexts that you are pinning on me are your own invention, I just say about unfaithful representation of history in the press. What is the purpose of ha
by mopsi 2y ago
> The subtexts that you are pinning on me are your own invention, I just say about unfaithful representation of history in the press.
What is the purpose of having to mention that Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were in Russian Empire in the context of their invasion and occupation in the 1940s if not an attempt to give legitimacy to the invasions?
It's far more important to stress that the people on the Baltic coast are not Russians, have nothing in common with them, nor have never wanted to be close with them. The same applies to the many other indigenous Finno-Ugric peoples[1] on the other side of the border inside the present-day Russia who have been driven away from their land like Native Americans and decimated with hostile policies that have resulted in their rapid decline.
[1] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FeoDW20WQAESJuZ?format=jpg&name=large https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FeoDW20WQAESJuZ?format=jpg&name=...
- thriftwy 2y ago> people on the Baltic coast are not Russians, have nothing in common with them, nor have never wanted to be close with them That wording already shows an unexpected amount of agitation that would prompt further inquires. > have been driven away from their land like Native Americans and decimated with hostile policies that have resulted in their rapid decline That's mostly an unfaithful description of what's been happening, no. It also runs counter to the previous "have nothing in common with them, nor have never wanted to be close with them". If you really didn't want to be close to Russians you would get out of our hair for a chance.