>but why are they chasing against porn sites vs finance sites? They view pornography as a purely or at least sufficiently negative presence, justifying going a

>but why are they chasing against porn sites vs finance sites? They view pornography as a purely or at least sufficiently negative presence, justifying going after it. Legislating to withhold it from children is more straightforward and politically palatable than an outright ban. The deanonymization of the internet is probably an acceptable risk more than a desired outcome. I assume it's the same mindset as people who end free speech to crusade against hate speech.