4 ms·
According to the authors it's also faster on files full of 'x' or ' ', so there must be more than just better unicode support.
by brainwad 2y ago
According to the authors it's also faster on files full of 'x' or ' ', so there must be more than just better unicode support.
- yencabulator 2y agoEven something as simple as wc calling a libc function for parsing utf-8, that doesn't get inlined, would destroy its performance relative to anything optimized. Personally, I'd expect SIMD to win over all of these. wc sounds like kind of challenge that's very easy to partition and process in chunks, though UTF-8 might ruin that.
- teo_zero 2y ago> very easy to partition and process in chunks Which counters to increment at each byte depends on the previous bytes, though. You could probably succeed using overlapping chunks, but I wouldn't call it very easy.
- yencabulator 2y agoThat sort of "find the correct chunk boundary" logic was very common with all the mapreduce processing that was done when people still used the phrase big data.