4 ms·
Sure. I (mostly) knew all that. I was specifically asking why you said "thy are full of n-gons" - my understanding of the terminology seems to be different to
by andybak 2y ago
Sure. I (mostly) knew all that. I was specifically asking why you said "thy are full of n-gons" - my understanding of the terminology seems to be different to yours in that "n-gons" means "5 or more sides on a face". i.e. not a tri or a quad.
- BoredPositron 2y agoYour definition is right. Look at the produced models and not the images in the paper.
- andybak 2y agoI have generated two models and they consisted of nothing but triangular faces.
- BoredPositron 2y agoMate I really don't know how to help you but even on the examples in the pdf there are clearly n-gons. In 5 of my 10 test there were n-gons. There are always starfishes with 5 or more connected verts. If you want to nitpick on the wording go ahead but these meshes are shite.
- andybak 2y agoI wasn't picking a fight or scoring points. This isn't Reddit and I'm a grown adult. I'm trying to understand what you're saying and maybe learn something in the process. > In 5 of my 10 test there were n-gons. There are always starfishes with 5 or more connected verts. Ok. So you are basing your definition on the number of edges that meet at a vertex. My understanding was that the important metric was "number of edges on a given face"