2 ms·
> THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL PROMULGATE REGULATIONS IDENTIFYING [...] AVAILABLE AGE DETERMINATION TECHNIQUES [...] PREVALENT PRACTICES OF THE INDUSTRY [...] SUC
by card_zero 2y ago
> THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL PROMULGATE REGULATIONS IDENTIFYING [...] AVAILABLE AGE DETERMINATION TECHNIQUES [...] PREVALENT PRACTICES OF THE INDUSTRY [...] SUCH REGULATIONS SHALL SET FORTH MULTIPLE COMMERCIALLY REASONABLE AND TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE METHODS [...] INCLUDING AT LEAST ONE METHOD THAT EITHER DOES NOT RELY SOLELY ON GOVERNMENT ISSUED IDENTIFICATION OR THAT ALLOWS A COVERED USER TO MAINTAIN ANONYMITY
It looks like the plan is for the companies to do age verification somehow. Details to be arranged later, by somebody.
- chimeracoder 2y ago> INCLUDING AT LEAST ONE METHOD THAT EITHER DOES NOT RELY SOLELY ON GOVERNMENT ISSUED IDENTIFICATION OR THAT ALLOWS A COVERED USER TO MAINTAIN ANONYMITY I honestly have no idea what this is supposed to mean.
- card_zero 2y agoI think this part is to prevent it conflicting with other laws about privacy ("a covered user" translates as "some kid") and "Existing New York anti-discrimination laws" as it mentions elsewhere, because you can't be discriminated against for lacking government ID.