3 ms·
> Then look at productivity during the pandemic vs now and let then explain how WFH hampered those numbers. I thought in general it was widely agreed upon at t
by tick_tock_tick 2y ago
> Then look at productivity during the pandemic vs now and let then explain how WFH hampered those numbers.
I thought in general it was widely agreed upon at this point WFH is at-least a 10% drop in productivity. Stanford has been doing plenty of research in this area. The argument in favor of WFH has for the most part moved on to now cost savings from not having offices lets you hire more people to make up for the loss in productivity.
https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/working-paper/evolution-working-home https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/working-paper/evolut...
- faeriechangling 2y agoWork from home might result in 90% productivity. A disabled employee out of work certainly results in 0% productivity.
- WWLink 2y ago> I thought in general it was widely agreed upon at this point WFH is at-least a 10% drop in productivity. Stanford has been doing plenty of research in this area. The argument in favor of WFH has for the most part moved on to now cost savings from not having offices lets you hire more people to make up for the loss in productivity. I wonder if they covered that people working from home may get sick less and work longer hours. Ye gods, I can concentrate better at home than I can in an open floorplan office lol :D