4 ms·
Thank you for saying this. I got 'flagged' when I said it more irritably. The solution is so simple and the payoff so great that it seems to me that the standar
by tqwhite 2y ago
Thank you for saying this. I got 'flagged' when I said it more irritably. The solution is so simple and the payoff so great that it seems to me that the standards bodies are a bad process.
Me? I'd prefer importSync() to having require() cover ESM files. I think it would be more clear but, either way, it would do exactly what you say, open the CJS world to migration.
- bastawhiz 2y ago> I'd prefer importSync() to having require() cover ESM files. My only criticism is that in order to do incremental conversion, both need to work. At that point, you'd might as well just eliminate the cognitive overhead and have one function.