3 ms·
I understand you need to call OpenAI through iOS to send data to them and that's all non-identifying information, but they literally having top executives quitt
by lancesells 2y ago
I understand you need to call OpenAI through iOS to send data to them and that's all non-identifying information, but they literally having top executives quitting because of ethical concerns. Look at all the dirty tricks Meta and Google has used to get around privacy settings. Why is anyone putting their faith in a seemingly bad actor whose entire business is admittedly built on theft? This isn't an industry built on good faith and the billions invested in these companies will have to be paid.
- quitit 2y agoI hear your concerns, but one needs to find the dividing line between adversarial online discourse and the reality of what is being offered. If OpenAI looks scary because there is a buzz around it, then that's indicative that one is building opinions based on a "vibe". That's fine to do for yourself because the user is in no way compelled to use OpenAI, and Apple's implementation clearly delineates when OpenAI is available, and specifically requests the user's consent every single time, while also showing what information would be sent to OpenAI. Additionally the announced plan is to make this part of the system easily switched to other AI providers, much like one switches their search engine. So if your personal leanings are supportive of a different AI provider, then that is your option to change. I think you would really benefit from reading about how Apple plans to introduce these features, and the specific privacy protections made not just for OpenAI, but also for processing on Apple's own AI-nodes. They have taken threat actors very seriously in their approach, and you'll see that this approach is genuinely different from what is currently being offered: https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/ https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/