4 ms·
From Gilead's press release: " PURPOSE 1, a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized study, is evaluating the safety and efficacy of twice-yearly, subcutaneous lenaca
by worldvoyageur 2y ago
From Gilead's press release:
"
PURPOSE 1, a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized study, is evaluating the safety and efficacy of twice-yearly, subcutaneous lenacapavir for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and once-daily oral Descovy® (emtricitabine 200mg and tenofovir alafenamide 25mg; F/TAF) in more than 5,300 cisgender women and adolescent girls aged 16-25 across 25 sites in South Africa and three sites in Uganda. The drugs are being tested in parallel, with one group receiving twice-yearly lenacapavir and one group taking once-daily oral Descovy. Additionally, a third group was assigned once-daily oral Truvada. Study participants were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to lenacapavir, Descovy and Truvada, respectively. Because effective PrEP options already exist, there is broad consensus in the PrEP field that a placebo group would be unethical; thus, the trial used bHIV as the primary comparator and Truvada as a secondary comparator.
There were 0 incident cases of HIV infection among 2,134 women in the lenacapavir group (incidence 0.00 per 100 person-years). There were 16 incident cases among 1,068 women in the Truvada group (incidence 1.69 per 100 person-years). The results demonstrated superiority of twice-yearly lenacapavir over bHIV (primary endpoint, incidence 2.41 per 100 person-years) and superiority of twice-yearly lenacapavir over once-daily Truvada (secondary endpoint), with p<0.0001 for both endpoints. In the trial, lenacapavir was generally well-tolerated and no significant or new safety concerns were identified.
[...]
Gilead expects results in late 2024/early 2025 from the program’s other pivotal trial, PURPOSE 2, which is assessing twice-yearly lenacapavir for PrEP among cisgender men who have sex with men, transgender men, transgender women and gender non-binary individuals who have sex with partners assigned male at birth in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, South Africa, Thailand and the United States.
"
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- levocardia 2y agoThis is a legitimately amazing result and a huge win against HIV. I hope it replicates in PURPOSE 2. Zero incident cases in an at-risk population is, frankly, fantastic, in a country where prevalence of HIV ranges from 12-27% depending on the province.
- hawk_ 2y agoVaaS (Vaccine as a Service) suits Gilead as a business model,
- vfclists 2y ago[flagged]
- devman0 2y agoI read that as cisgendered && (women || adolescent girls) && (16 <= age <= 25). Basically 'cisgendered' and the age range are describing all study participants which which are all either women or adolescent girls which makes sense to me based on how I believe these trials are generally constructed.
- aetherspawn 2y agoWell HIV is most common amongst homosexual populations, so it is just clarifying that they gave the drug to straight girls in the first trial.
- viraptor 2y agoCisgender doesn't mean straight. They may be homosexual, just not trans.
- aetherspawn 2y agoI see, so you're saying that "cisgender female" means Female As Identified at Birth, but includes both trans and not trans groups regardless? Thus, "cisgender female" includes both homosexuals and non-homosexuals (and non-binary etc), but actually some from this group may presently identify as male? I did not know this.
- viraptor 2y agoA bit simpler: cisgender means same/matching gender, basically the opposite of trans-gender. If the gender you identify as is the one matching your birth sex default, you're cisgender. But it's completely separate from your attraction to other people, so straight, gay, anything is fine in either category.
- zzzizizzn 2y ago