4 ms·
Systemd 256.1: Now slightly less likely to delete /home
- fsniper 2y agoLol: "Fixes -catastrophic data loss-, er, -bug-, er -poorly documented feature-... user error"
- lproven 2y ago[Author here] I try. :-D
- adamomada 2y agoThey really should have renamed it systemd-files five years ago, it might have let the user know it wasn’t just purging tmp https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/12447 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/12447
- NekkoDroid 2y agoif anything systemd-sysfiles, but this is exactly what they meant with bikeshedding.
- pm2222 2y agoi have issue with it automatically deleting files from /tmp which is a shared dir: $ cat /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/tmp.conf q /tmp 1777 root root 10d q /var/tmp 1777 root root 30d
- NekkoDroid 2y agoHow likely is someone gonna look at those files if they haven't been even accessed in the last 10/30 days? It checks ctime, mtime and atime to determine if it should remove the file (or you can also flock(2) them) and if any of them are less than the time it doesn't.
- hulitu 2y ago> Systemd 256.1: Now slightly less likely to delete /home That's why ransomware runs on Windows. On linux, with SystemD [1], there is nothing to ransom. /s [1] I run Slackware.