3 ms·

Genuine question on your preferred use-cases: Would you be comfortable with some probability of misinformation/mistakes/inaccuracies? Or would you accept the r

• senordevnyc 2y ago
  Not the parent commenter, but I want those same things, and yes, I'll take a tradeoff of possible inaccuracy. Ideally the tool will give me the answers AND some relevant quotes / links to double check things myself if something feels off. We live in a very messy information space, both publicly and privately, and we navigate it with messy, sometimes-inaccurate brains. I don't expect LLMs to operate at a higher level of formal logic than a human brain does.
• eskibars 2y ago
  I think anybody that asserts their "human in the loop" doesn't have the same problem is biased/delusional. People make mistakes: even the best people. We accept that risk as colleagues/employers/employees because there's a human connection, but that doesn't make it nonexistent. We're now trying to figure out how to deal with that when you're "employing" AI, and whether the risk tolerance is higher or lower alongside the reduced operational cost