3 ms·
This is defeatist and wrong. Technology can be used to cross political barriers and solve issues, that's what the government intends to stop. They like the App
by talldayo 2y ago
This is defeatist and wrong. Technology can be used to cross political barriers and solve issues, that's what the government intends to stop. They like the App Store and Google Play store, because if dissenting apps pop up they only have 2 companies to call to get it removed[0]. They like people perceiving an iMessage/RCS duopoly because that's only 2 secure channels to backdoor[1]. Threatening you with jail-time is all they can do for escaping their ire, but that's an unjust and disproportionate response from any state-level actor.
The "average consumer" has been joking about their 'FBI guy' and freaking them out with weird porn or spurious Amazon carts for a decade now. We've hit the peaks of disillusionment, we've started down the road of exploitation and most of us are starting to worry that this trend of technological limitation is specifically intended to make us politically weak.
[0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/09/17/navalny-google-apple-app-russia/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/09/17/navalny-g...
[1] https://apnews.com/article/canada-us-india-sikh-activist-killing-intelligence-c475ac129e09e5f1c9ebf68eaaf247ab https://apnews.com/article/canada-us-india-sikh-activist-kil...
- Bluestein 2y agoI like the quote attributed to Vitalik Buterin about how "whereas most technologies tend to automate on the periphery, blockchains automate away the center." If you descentralize, you democratize.-
- simianparrot 2y agoAh yes blockchains, where there is no privacy by design.
- Retr0id 2y agoIt's not defeatist. The point is that legislative decisions still matter, a lot. Take the Chinese Great Firewall, for example. Yes, you can use technical means to circumvent it, but the effort required (and inevitably degraded performance) means that the median citizen does not.