3 ms·
> >you can't make coffee cup rides not sickening by software. > Plainly false. I'm not sure how this is false, but I'm also not sure what the person you're re
by ChainOfFools 2y ago
> >you can't make coffee cup rides not sickening by software.
> Plainly false.
I'm not sure how this is false, but I'm also not sure what the person you're replying to is getting at. coffee cup rides have no driver and therefore no look ahead path planning at all.
The entire appeal of these rides is that they exaggerate perception of third and higher derivatives by deliberately creating a chaotic field of view for their occupants, combined with constantly changing both the rate and direction of the acceleration of their squishy bodies in the rigid capsules to which they are loosely secured.
Smoothing this out with software would be possible, sure, but then the result would no longer be a coffee cup ride. I feel like this is a poorly formed example.
- numpad0 2y agoI was thinking what would be the most steady and disorienting activity with higher integrals of lateral accelerations, and couldn't come up with a better example than a cup ride. I admit it wasn't a good one.