2 ms·
No, what you're saying is that a circle has "evolved" into a square but it's it's fine to still call it a circle. Of course it isn't. Again, it seems obvious y
by mytailorisrich 2y ago
No, what you're saying is that a circle has "evolved" into a square but it's it's fine to still call it a circle. Of course it isn't.
Again, it seems obvious you do not understand what socialism vs capitalism means, as explained before and for the reasons explained before, as your latest comment is not apt at all and besides the point. I would nicely suggest you have a good read at the Wikipedia pages in English, which look less manipulated that the ones in French (more scrutiny?), or even Marxist stuff if you are up to. Enjoy!
- palata 2y ago> Again, it seems obvious you do not understand what socialism vs capitalism means Turns out I studied Marx ;-). > No, what you're saying is that a circle has "evolved" into a square but it's it's fine to still call it a circle. Of course it isn't. My turn, now: it seems obvious that you do not understand how languages work.
- mytailorisrich 2y agoThis is not language this is an economical and political theory... > Turns out I studied Marx Pull the other one!