>It has nothing about domination. I think you better explain that to the politicians in Washington who have long since weaponized the petrodollar. >You're the

>It has nothing about domination. I think you better explain that to the politicians in Washington who have long since weaponized the petrodollar. >You're the one unilaterally trying to trade with a medium of exchange that no one uses. The assumption that there aren't alternatives to the petrodollar actively being used today is entirely false. You may not see it - perhaps because of your own investments in the petrodollar - but it is definitely happening. And then, there is Bitcoin. You might want to see which weapons manufacturers accept bitcoin in payment, and which only prefer the blood-stained petrodollar. That might give you a clue as to your own myopia. >Russia either buys anything at all from India, which so far has been a no, You are aware that there is a rail line from Moscow to India, right, and that it operates entirely outside the scope of Western control?