3 ms·
Seeing that for passes the measurement generally given is their height, not their width, the title is a bit confusing (at least for me): the pass is at a height
by rob74 2y ago
Seeing that for passes the measurement generally given is their height, not their width, the title is a bit confusing (at least for me): the pass is at a height of 2,273 m, and it's 30 m wide.
- RamblingCTO 2y agoWhy would you expect a pass in the pyrenees to be 30m in height? I don't think there's a single point that's that low
- Piskvorrr 2y agoI have been expecting a range, in which there's a pass that's 30m in height below the average of the ridge: -----_--- (edit: apparently features like that exist, e.g. Roland's Breach)