> Even if it’s meant as tongue-in-cheek, It is not this. There is actual anger there, he's pointing out WHY he's pissed. > it’s not at all evident that they’

> Even if it’s meant as tongue-in-cheek, It is not this. There is actual anger there, he's pointing out WHY he's pissed. > it’s not at all evident that they’ve taken the time to interact with the tech as an end user (which millions upon millions have, last time I checked) He covers this point, in depth in the article. From a few angles.