The Emergencies Act was a law previously called, renamed, from the War Measures Act. There was a post-POEC commission required to be held within a certain peri

The Emergencies Act was a law previously called, renamed, from the War Measures Act. There was a post-POEC commission required to be held within a certain period of time of the invocation the Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC) - where it was the person, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau who invoked the act - who selected his long-time family friend to be the commissioner of said commission, Rouleau, to conclude whether invoking the Emergencies Act was valid or not; conflict of interest should immediately come to mind for everyone, along with then questioning the integrity and legitimacy of the POEC - if going by good faith. Commissioner Rouleau concluded it was valid - but also concluded that any reasonable person could come to the completely opposite conclusion that he did, giving no backbone to his conclusion - but definitely producing the narrative talking points and conclusion that state-funded media then heavily propagated to all Canadians. In the actual Canadian courts however, once it went through the actual judicial system that was bound by law and where the non-government lawyers actually had the tools of the courts to use - and where the judge/commissioner couldn't play favourites - where the judge wasn't assigned by Trudeau himself, where Rouleau wasn't a filter/shield in place having to approve any witnesses (etc) and that were asked to testify, while allowing improper processes that aren't acceptable in normal courts for very good reason [like dumping 1,000s of pages of evidence, on the desks of the lawyers prosecuting the government, the day before certain witnesses would be testifying] - the courts found that the Emergencies Act was illegally invoked, that it didn't meet the very clear prerequisites-criteria to determine if it was a national emergency or not. The fraudulent nature of the POEC process listed above was far more egregious than this, however most who have already been convinced the Trudeau government are honest and with integrity, already scoff and dismiss the courts findings, and so there's little point to point to sharing the even more blatant corruption of law and order processes by the government and its lawyers-representatives. Re: Terrorist-financing act & intent The current Canadian government in power (a coalition between Trudeau-Liberals and the NDP party, giving them the power of a majority - the NDP playing "good cop" as part of their theatre for Canadians who aren't aware of more than the shallow level of what is presented them in state-funded media) didn't succeed specifically in defining the Freedom Convoy under the Terrorist Act, however it was clear that the intent-hope of the Liberal-Trudeau political party was in fact wanting to have the Freedom Convoy labeled as a terrorist group was their intent-hope; this is the epitome of guilt by association - eliminating the fundamental "innocent unless proven guilty" rule of law, if I may be so bold point out. E.g. Chrystia Freeland during the POEC had notes brought into evidence while she was testifying, where I can't remember if now if it was 1) her notes, or 2) the notes of the head of RCMP (our national police force's name) stating that she wanted the Freedom Convoy classified as terrorists - so then they could be treated as such under the current law; Freeland, the current Finance Minister of Canada, and Deputy Prime Minister - the #2 to Prime Minister Trudeau - same position as the US' Vice President - where she who has practically no education or experience in regards to finance. But that's moot really because as they invoked the Emergencies Act - found to be illegal by the courts [not by their long-term family friend] - they had at least the same ability by actions they could execute on under that law to seize assets/property like money-bank accounts, etc. So if the government had the same capabilities allowed under a terrorist-finance act, and used some of them - that's akin, just as bad, right? The vast majority of people have only seen the narrative talking points propagated by the state-funded media like CBC and the politicians toeing this Trudeau-NDP line, who've been doing their best to suppress the voices of their political dissidents; now where they're attempting to suppress the political dissidents and dissident political party (the Conservatives) from releasing the names of the known Liberal-NDP politicians that our intelligence agencies confirmed willingly and/or willfully blindly accepted help knowingly from the CCP; the common understanding is if these were Conservative politicians, or if the majority were Conservatives, then these names would have been published immediately - but CSIS (our version of CIA) whistle blowers previously released intelligence that China-CCP previously helped Trudeau and other party members win in at least the last 2 elections.