I’ll show the article to my linguistics friends and see what they say. From the beginning, there has always been a vocal minority in the field opposed to Chomsk

I’ll show the article to my linguistics friends and see what they say. From the beginning, there has always been a vocal minority in the field opposed to Chomsky; I don’t know rhetorical merits of the Scientific American article and if it represents anything new. The professional linguists I associate with haven’t brought anything earth-shatteringly new to my attention that seriously challenges UG. Thanks though.