Furthermore: > Who is supposedly at risk of being fired if not the person who wrote the document? The one who stands to benefit from the lie. In the case of t

Furthermore: > Who is supposedly at risk of being fired if not the person who wrote the document? The one who stands to benefit from the lie. In the case of the ordinary Joe that is of course one and the same; he can't afford to hire someone to delegate his CV faking to. But just because the bigshots can offload “trivial” tasks like that onto someone else doesn't make the moral responsibility anyone else's than their own. Suggesting the one who should be fired is the office slave who actually typed the hype is 1) As absurd as Joe Schmoe claiming it isn't he, but the pen he signed his faked CV with that should be fired; and 2) A sign of a wholly non-functional moral compass.