3 ms·
This is about repeating the word many times in isolation of other words, not using an exaggeration for lesser things so the meaning drifts. I think everyone's f
by EnigmaFlare 2y ago
This is about repeating the word many times in isolation of other words, not using an exaggeration for lesser things so the meaning drifts. I think everyone's familiar with it by trying to say the same word over and over again, it quickly becomes weird and seems to lose its meaning or even become hard to say.
- SonOfLilit 2y agoGP is engaging in the iconic HN tradition of commenting something brilliant that has nothing to do with TFA. Literally seconds later, someone has to point out the epic failure. I've been reading HN for 17 years, and I must lament that it is turning "blazingly fast" into reddit. Because of people like me, I guess :)
- khazhoux 2y agoIs that more or less frequent than the HN anti-pattern: "I thought this was about..." as if that being wrong about what article was about was in any way interesting? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40339500 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40339500 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40666558 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40666558 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39436430 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39436430
- mpalmer 2y agoOuch. I've been reading and commenting for years here, but I don't presume to gatekeep, or indeed lament that it's turning into reddit(?), the latter being distinctly against the HN commenting guidelines. Just downvote me and move on, you've got the karma for it. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- SonOfLilit 2y agoI upvoted you, and definitely didn't mean any offence
- mpalmer 2y agoMy bad, I misread both your tone and your meaning, an impressive combo. Cheers -