> scales down to zero (with per second billing) > It's just that nobody has chosen to do so If we're having fun with "everything old is new again", then I do

> scales down to zero (with per second billing) > It's just that nobody has chosen to do so If we're having fun with "everything old is new again", then I do remember some classic hosts for things like "Guestbook" perl CGI scripts would charge in those days per-"impression" (view/action), it's not quite CPU time but a close approximate you'd hope, and the associated costs would scale down to zero whether or not their hosting tech actually did. (Also, some of them certainly didn't scale to "infinity", though they tried.)