5 ms·
I usually have to tweak my home rackmount equipment over IPMI to set the fan settings to idle when temps are low instead of 24/7/365 jet engine mode which the l
by timschmidt 2y ago
I usually have to tweak my home rackmount equipment over IPMI to set the fan settings to idle when temps are low instead of 24/7/365 jet engine mode which the local university datacenter seems to prefer. I imagine running the fans full blast all the time results in slightly more reliable performance and reliability, but I don't have the luxury of a soundproof HVAC controlled room to lock everything away in, so the lower noise at lower utilization matters to me. This trade-off definitely happens all over the place in enterprise gear.
- justinclift 2y agoYou've been through all the stuff like setting max device power for the NVMe drives and similar yeah? https://nvmexpress.org/resource/technology-power-features/ https://nvmexpress.org/resource/technology-power-features/
- timschmidt 2y agoI just upgraded my main server to an https://www.supermicro.com/products/archive/motherboard/x9drw-3f https://www.supermicro.com/products/archive/motherboard/x9dr... with dual Xeon E5-2680v2s. $15 for 20c/40t and 256gb ECC from the local university surplus. Unfortunately, it's still a little too old to offer NVME. That doesn't matter too much to me, since it's connected via 6gbps SAS to several 24 bay NetApp disk shelves (also $15 ea!) full of disks. I have dealt with PCIe ASPM (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_State_Power_Management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_State_Power_Management) which similarly trades off between performance, power consumption, and latency. I am not hugely concerned with power consumption as I have solar panels. But noise and excess heat matter to me. My whole stack is consuming around 650W currently. Wildly removed from the days I was running off a creatively overprovisioned OpenWRT wireless router using < 20W. But I'm happy to have the increased capacity for my use cases. Gigabit synchronous fiber to the home is a dangerous drug :)
- justsomehnguy 2y agoJust use PCI-E converter for NVMe. You wouldn't be able to boot from it, but it would work just fine.
- timschmidt 2y agoA good suggestion, but it's a 1U server with both available PCIe slots populated between the external SAS controller and a dual 10gbE CNA. I boot from SATA SSDs currently. Could upgrade to enterprise SAS SSDs, but haven't noticed a need for my current uses. The boot drive is rarely touched, as most data terminates at the NetApp disk shelves, which have been a far more reliable way to connect unholy amounts of storage to a machine than any of the consumer direct attached storage options I've tried in the past. There's a mix of SSDs and spinning rust in the disk shelves - SSDs for web server stuff and spinning rust for low cost bulk storage.
- justinclift 2y ago> with both available PCIe slots populated between the external SAS controller and a dual 10gbE CNA. Interestingly, there do appear to be PCIe cards that have both external SAS and high speed networking in one: https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/unique-oem-dual-lsi-2308-mellanox-connectx-3-vpi-combo-expansion-cards.30532/ https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/unique-oem... Looks like a bunch of mucking around is needed to get things setup, but seems like it works ok from that point onwards: • https://www.ebay.com/itm/314150370285 https://www.ebay.com/itm/314150370285 Have been considering grabbing one to try in a HP Microserver Gen 8 that runs Proxmox. Not a lot of free time at the moment though. ;)
- timschmidt 2y agoNeat! And affordable! Thanks! I will definitely look further into them. I got the 10gbE CNA from another university surplus find where a half dozen were being used as 16gb fibre channel adapters with SFP fibre modules. A little digging revealed that they could be switched to 10gbE CNA mode which is a lot more useful for my purposes. Enterprise gear is full of surprises :D Only potential downside I see is the included pcie switch chip. It's dividing up 8gbps between three devices which could independently consume all of that bandwidth. Probably not a huge issue for my uses, but worth considering if you plan on transferring large amounts of data over network and storage simultaneously.