3 ms·
In the article it's shown that the CEO stated that you only have to pay if you make $50k+ as a software engineer. According to the article, they have not had c
by jph00 2y ago
In the article it's shown that the CEO stated that you only have to pay if you make $50k+ as a software engineer.
According to the article, they have not had court victories to support their claims.
- lopkeny12ko 2y agoWhen I was doing my undergrad, the university published statistics saying something to the tune of "the average engineering graduate goes on to earn a $60k salary at their first job." If only I knew at the time I could have simply taken the university to court because my starting salary out of school was $55k.
- Spivak 2y agoIf paying your student loans was contingent on you making $60k, you made $55k, and they came knocking at your door demanding money yes I do think you have grounds to sue and not pay them. I don't care one iota about the legal minutiae that says they're technically allowed to collect, it is blatantly obvious what the students thought they were signing and so it's really hard to argue "no actually they agreed to <this other thing>." If you present paperwork that you say is the legalese version of the agreement you discussed, have the other party sign it on that basis, and then it isn't that is the lowest hanging fruit of contracts that should be thrown out.