3 ms·
They have amenities but they are often reserved for the people who actually hold a lease vs the community, unless that amenity is renting one of the public faci
by kjkjadksj 2y ago
They have amenities but they are often reserved for the people who actually hold a lease vs the community, unless that amenity is renting one of the public facing retail units. In contrast seems like there are more public/municipal improvements brought in when bog standard suburbia is built by developers instead, where a developer might have to also build public parks and roads and schools.
- dangus 2y agoSince when do suburban subdivision developers build public parks and schools? I have never heard of a single family housing development that did that. They may build roads and then turn over the more expensive long-term maintenance over to the town. What’s wrong with multi-unit buildings that have private amenities? Do you let people into your yard to use your swing set and pool? Aren’t there a lot of single family home communities not have private HOA amenities too? Once again a higher standard is being applied to multi-family homes because of how much Americans are conditioned to hate them. Anything a multi-family building does is sinful but the God-fearing single family home’s private amenities are sacred freedom-loving private property.