4 ms·
The slack blog is for engineers. It's PR to hire in talent. The INFOQ article is for your C types. It's the spin on what buzz words they should be using with t
by zer00eyz 2y ago
The slack blog is for engineers. It's PR to hire in talent.
The INFOQ article is for your C types. It's the spin on what buzz words they should be using with their peers and to make a splash in the market.
NFT, Crypto, Cloud, Microservice, SAS, Podcast (the first time when there wasnt video), Web 2.0, The Ad (double-click, pre google) market, The Dot Com Bubble...
Im sure I missed a few hype cycles in there.
Both articles show how deep we are in the stink of this one.
Im tired of swimming the bullshit, It keeps getting in my mouth.
- ben_jones 2y agoThus the conclusion should be heavily scrutinize future infoq .com articles and perhaps future articles by the same author Eran Stiller. We shouldn’t detach responsibility from the publisher and author.
- nl 2y agoExcept the article turns out to be accurate (see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40728179 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40728179) So I guess the publisher and author should get credit. I'll leave others to discuss the misleading comment...
- phillipcarter 2y agoHah. A lot of tech folks like to trash journalists (it's fine, I get it, there's legitimate reasons) ... but then misread source content that the journalist interpreted better/correctly.