4 ms·
Good result. There's rarely such a thing as a clear, objectively simple 'good result' for this sort of action because outcomes have knock-on effects. For examp
by onion2k 2y ago
Good result.
There's rarely such a thing as a clear, objectively simple 'good result' for this sort of action because outcomes have knock-on effects. For example, if the North Koreans responsible for maintaining internet access were executed over this that diminishes the result significantly.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- golergka 2y agoGood point, but the original comment was about whether the hacker was morally dubious, not the outcomes. If a bad actor does bad things because of what you did, you're not morally responsible for it — he is.