Yes, exactly. It'd act as deterrent for anyone considering to exaggerate or misrepresent findings. Also, it'd lead to a quicker dissemination of true findings.

Yes, exactly. It'd act as deterrent for anyone considering to exaggerate or misrepresent findings. Also, it'd lead to a quicker dissemination of true findings. Currently, academic publications are in a bit of market for lemons situation [1], where the seller (authors) have much more information than the buyers (readers, funders). Time to change that. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Market_for_Lemons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Market_for_Lemons