6 ms·
Good idea, I think that’s a healthy minimum. If C level fellas were aware of the violations or didn’t do their due diligence then let’s say a 5 year minimum pri
by latentcall 2y ago
Good idea, I think that’s a healthy minimum. If C level fellas were aware of the violations or didn’t do their due diligence then let’s say a 5 year minimum prison sentence.
- 6510 2y agoI agree but in this case the duration of the prison sentence should not be disclosed.
- paulddraper 2y agoDo you genuinely believe your boss pushing for too-high productivity quotas warrants jail time? We talk of "overcriminalization."
- lux-lux-lux 2y agoThe aggregate harm of these measures vastly exceeds, say, a violent assault. Amazon has double the rate of serious injuries compared to rival companies.
- harimau777 2y agoIf it leads to negligent harm then that seems reasonable.
- elevatedastalt 2y agoWhat is the negligent harm here?
- jnordwick 2y agoThis is how you get sky high CEO salaries. If they are going to help criminally liable, their salaries are going to have to rise to reflect the increased risk. If you got your way, C-level compensation would go up 10x or higher? I'm sure then you would be asking why CEO salaries are so high and we need to do something about them.
- JumpCrisscross 2y agoYou’d eliminate the CEO position and delegate to a management company. Family businesses would, in practice, have been outlawed. In summary, a panacea for private equity.