3 ms·
For labor laws, I’m not sure that’s as bad idea as your sarcasm might indicate. Perhaps, instead, “a mandatory fine shall be levied of 100% of direct and indire
by altairprime 2y ago
For labor laws, I’m not sure that’s as bad idea as your sarcasm might indicate. Perhaps, instead, “a mandatory fine shall be levied of 100% of direct and indirect labor expenses (including benefits, unpaid wages, and court-ordered wages) during each calendar year in which labor violations occurred”. That way there’s a natural cap on it to satisfy the courts, but it’s still large enough that any violations are actually a threat to megacorps.
- ipaddr 2y agoOr amazon moves to hire workers who are employed by other agencies to reduce risk.
- harimau777 2y agoThen pass a law to make them liable even if the employees are employed by other agencies.
- altairprime 2y agoThat’s already in place, I think, with recent labor law changes — not that FedEx Home Delivery or Amazon Logistics want to acknowledge that!