3 ms·
Oh yes. This will work just great. No miscommunication is going to happen as a result of this at all. Can we stop enabling corporations to operate in a "gaslig
by salawat 2y ago
Oh yes. This will work just great. No miscommunication is going to happen as a result of this at all.
Can we stop enabling corporations to operate in a "gaslight the proles" fashion? I know for a fact that actual emotional state is tracked as a characteristic metric for callers. And I love the touch of couching it as a "worker protection" while leaving completely unaddressed the matter that it is often the corporation in question behaving in a disruptive or degenerative way that ends up leading to highly emotionally agitated customers.
I do not want a box on the line trying to rephrase feedback from me. When I am pissed because a corporation is making my life untenable or difficult, I want the message heard loud and clear.
In fact, here ya go: make an AI that'll measure the emotional activation of a caller, and route the call automatically up the chain to an exec, so they have unquestionable feedback on how well they are doing straight from the aggrieved.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- yummypaint 2y agoI always thought it would be nice if whenever windows throws up a nag box, there were a third button labeled "no, and fuck you" that increments a counter in the lobby of MS headquarters or something.
- brokenmachine 2y agoIf only. All we get nowadays with these rapist mentality corporations is "Yes", and if we're lucky an "Ask me again later".
- freetanga 2y agoWe would need 256-bit architecture to handle that kind of load…
- trod123 2y agoAt its core, this is designed to destroy any ability to communicate by intentionally distorting reflected appraisal. See my post why that's a bad idea.