I think it's system prompt dependent. I asked LLaMa-2-70B iQ2s which was set up with a system prompt telling it to be logical and detail oriented. First try:

I think it's system prompt dependent. I asked LLaMa-2-70B iQ2s which was set up with a system prompt telling it to be logical and detail oriented. First try: I think there is a logical inconsistency in the text. If Joe drove Sue to university, then she was dropped off at the university, which means she would not be available to drink tea with him at his home afterwards. The sequence of events seems to be out of order. Second try: I notice that there's a small issue with the sequence of events. It seems unlikely that Joe drove home again after dropping Sue off at university, only to then drink tea with her in the kitchen. If Joe drove Sue to university, it implies she got out of the car at the university, not that he drove back home with her. A more logical sequence of events would be: Joe drove Sue to university. Afterwards, he drove home and drank a cup of tea by himself in the kitchen. Or, if you want to keep the scenario where Joe drinks tea with Sue: Joe drove Sue to university. They went back home together, and then they drank a cup of tea together in the kitchen.