4 ms·

What do you suggest they persecute facebook for? Making their app too fun for school?

• JohnMakin 2y ago
  Are you unaware of this massive story? https://www.thewellnews.com/mental-health/whistleblower-says-meta-execs-knew-social-media-can-harm-kids/ https://www.thewellnews.com/mental-health/whistleblower-says... There are plenty of other examples, such as default features they can put into place to protect children from harassment that they simply do not do.
  • emblaegh 2y ago
    So what? Killing a scapegoat does not a problem solve. You shut down facebook and then what happens? Everyone shuts the phone and enjoy the sunset or would they all just move to the next addictive app? Marlboros are not harmful, tobacco is. If we managed to largely curb smoking, it was by restricting access to tobacco.
    • JohnMakin 2y ago
      A scapegoat? Who is the problem then, if not them? No one is suggesting shutting them down either - the proposal is to hold them accountable for enacting policies they know harm children. Who in their right mind would be against that except a meta astroturfer? It would help your argument a lot more if you didn't resort to ridiculous hyperbole like this.
      • cooper_ganglia 2y ago
        >Who is the problem then, if not them? Why is that the only people responsible for their children in any way at all whatsoever are never held accountable?? It is always, 100%, in every and all cases, the parent's fault. Either they're too stupid to know better, or they simply don't care.