2 ms·
> Where's Windows containerization at? Doesn't exist. Not even UAC is a reliable security boundary. Likely, it will never exist. > Is there any other approach
by wizzwizz4 2y ago
> Where's Windows containerization at?
Doesn't exist. Not even UAC is a reliable security boundary. Likely, it will never exist.
> Is there any other approach which would allow for "non-white-listed applications" to run containerized and "see the Scarecrow artifacts",
Sounds a bit like WoW64. It should be easy enough to replicate this behaviour with a rootkit. However, the software would always be able to peek behind the curtain.
> In other words, the attacker is a healthy young cat chasing a tired old mouse.
I always thought of the attackers as the mice, and anti-malware folk as the cats.