2 ms·
Pike isn’t the final word on Go either. Hence why we have generics. I don’t really understand why you’re arguing about this. Go has generics now, isn’t it abou
by hnlmorg 2y ago
Pike isn’t the final word on Go either. Hence why we have generics.
I don’t really understand why you’re arguing about this. Go has generics now, isn’t it about time you moved onto a new soapbox?
- mardifoufs 2y agoI think they are just addressing this statement you made earlier: >The Go designers were never against generics (Fwiw I think I agree with both of you in this situation)
- pjmlp 2y agoDoesn't change the fact that the original authors weren't into generics, let's stop rewriting history here. Don't worry, Go still has lots of stuff to complain about.